• Skip to main content
itrc_logo

Soil Background and Risk Assessment

Home
About ITRC
1 Introduction
1 Introduction
1.1 Audience
1.2 Purpose
1.3 Use of Background in the Risk Assessment Process
1.4 Limitations
2 Soil Background Definition 
2 Soil Background Definition
2.1 Natural Soil Background
2.2 Anthropogenic Ambient Soil Background
2.3 Additional Background Definitions
3 Establishing Soil Background
3 Establishing Soil Background
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Conducting a Soil Background Study
3.3 Choosing an Area for a Soil Background Study
3.4 Sampling
3.5 Laboratory Analysis
3.6 Using an Existing Soil Background Study
3.7 Background Dataset Analysis
3.8 Establishing Default or Site-Specific Soil Background
3.9 Extracting Site-Specific Background Dataset from an On-site Dataset
4 Using Soil Background in Risk Assessment
4 Using Soil Background in Risk Assessment
4.1 Representative Site Concentration to Compare to a BTV
4.2 Using Default Background
4.3 Using Site-Specific Background
4.4 Use of Background for Remedial Goals
4.5 Additional Considerations
5 Geochemical Evaluations
5 Geochemical Evaluations
5.1 Geochemistry Is Not Statistics
5.2 Uses of Geochemical Evaluations
5.3 General Methodology
5.4 Nondetects
5.5 Key Geochemical Processes
5.6 Extracting Background Data from Existing Data
6 Using Geochemical Evaluations in Risk Assessment
6 Using Geochemical Evaluations in Risk Assessment
6.1 Using Geochemical Evaluations During COPC Selection
6.2 Using Geochemical Evaluations During Risk Characterization
6.3 Considerations
7 Environmental Forensics Related to soil Background
7 Environmental Forensics Related to soil Background
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
7.3 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
7.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
7.5 Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Dibenzofurans (PCDD/F)
7.6 Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)
7.7 Remote Sensing
8 Conceptual Site Model and Data Quality Objectives
8 Conceptual Site Model and Data Quality Objectives
8.1 Conceptual Site Model
8.2 Data Quality Objectives
9 Sampling
9 Sampling
9.1 Background Reference Areas
9.2 Sample Depth
9.3 Sample Size
9.4 Sample Methods
9.5 Sampling Design
9.6 Sample Collection Methods
9.7 Sample Handling
10 Analytical Methods
10 Analytical Methods
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Obtaining Reliable Analytical Data
10.3 Analytical Limits
10.4 Sample Preparation
10.5 Analytical Test Methods
11 Statistics
11 Statistics
11.1 Data Requirements
11.2 Data Distribution
11.3 Treatment of Nondetects
11.4 Graphical displays
11.5 Outliers
11.6 Confidence Interval Limit, Coefficient, and Limit
11.7 Statistical Values Used to Represent Background
11.8 Statistical Tests to Compare Site and Background Datasets
11.9 Statistical Software
12 Regulatory Framework from State Survey
12 Regulatory Framework from State Survey
12.1 Description of State Survey
12.2 Overview of State Survey Results
12.3 State Survey Results
13 Existing Guidance and Studies
14 Case Studies
14 Case Studies
14.1 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Soil Background Case Study
14.2 Former Firearms Training Range Soil Background Case Study
14.3 Region 4 RARE Urban Background Study
14.4 Geochemical Evaluation Case Study—Statistical Outlier is an Uncontaminated Soil Sample
14.5 Geochemical Evaluation Case Study—Statistical Outlier Is a Contaminated Soil Sample
14.6 Geochemical Evaluation Case Study–Contaminated Soil Sample Is Not a Statistical Outlier
14.7 Environmental Forensics Case Study—PAHs from Leaked Petroleum Versus Contaminated Fill
Frameworks
Frameworks
Framework 1
Framework 2
Framework 3
Appendices
Appendix A. Upper Limits Used to Estimate Background Threshold Values
Appendix B. Index Plots
Appendix C. Additional Sources of Information for PAHs in Soil
Additional Information
Team Contacts
Glossary
Acronyms
Acknowledgments
References
ITRC & EJ/DEI
Navigating this Website
Document Feedback

 

Soil Background and Risk Assessment
HOME

12 Regulatory Framework from State Survey

On March 9, 2020, a survey on use of soil background for risk assessment was sent to designated individuals who provide responses to ITRC surveys for each U.S. state and the District of Columbia. The purpose of the survey was to elicit current state practices for addressing soil background through the risk assessment processes. 

This survey focused on finding out how individual states currently handle soil background with respect to definitions, state guidance and regulations, use in risk assessment, and other factors. The survey did not target federal agencies or guidance available from other countries. Also, because in most cases the responses came from one person representing the state, they may not be complete, current, or represent the range of soil background uses in risk assessment from multiple jurisdictions within a state. Readers should consult with the appropriate state agencies for the most current approaches relevant to specific sites.

12.1 Description of State Survey

The survey included a mix of multiple choice and open-ended questions. The key questions were:

  • Does the state regulatory agency have a definition for natural and/or anthropogenic ambient soil background? If so, please provide the definition(s) and a link to the document where it is presented.
  • Does the state regulatory agency recommend using natural and/or anthropogenic ambient soil background values in risk assessment?
  • Has the state established statewide or regional natural and/or anthropogenic ambient soil background values? If so, please provide a link.
  • Have studies to establish statewide or regional natural and/or anthropogenic ambient soil background been conducted in the state with or without agency approval/endorsement? If so, please provide the reference or URL.
  • Will the regulatory agency allow geochemical evaluations to be used to support risk assessment?

12.2 Overview of State Survey Results

A total of 36 states, including the District of Columbia (71%), responded to the state survey, leaving 15 states (29%) with no responses, as shown in Table 12-1 Summary of the State Survey Summary.  Figure 12‑1 through Figure 12‑5 summarize the findings of the survey based on the above questions.

In general, of the 36 responses total, most address natural and/or anthropogenic ambient soil background in some way:

  • 61% indicated that states have definitions for natural soil background or for both natural and anthropogenic ambient soil background; no states responded that they have a definition for only anthropogenic ambient soil background.
  • 92% indicated that state agencies recommend using soil background values (natural, anthropogenic ambient, or both) sometimes in risk assessment.
  • 54% indicated that states have established soil background values, either natural and/or anthropogenic ambient.
  • 59% indicated that states have statewide or regional soil background studies.
  • 94% indicated that state agencies either allow geochemical evaluations or sometimes allow them, depending on site-specific conditions, to support risk assessments.
  • It should be noted that states that did not submit survey responses could have some level of guidance regarding natural or anthropogenic ambient soil background and its use in risk assessment. Thus, the percentages shown above and in Figure 12‑1 through Figure 12‑5 refer only to the 36 responses received.

12.3 State Survey Results

Figure 12‑1 shows the breakdown of responses to the first question, whether the states that responded to the survey have definitions for both natural and/or anthropogenic ambient soil background. For reference, Table 12-2 Summary of the State Survey Summary includes any definitions with comments or links that were provided in the survey responses.

Figure 12‑1. Definitions for natural and/or anthropogenic ambient soil background.

Figure 12‑2 summarizes the state survey responses regarding the use of natural and/or anthropogenic ambient soil background values in risk assessment. The survey question asked if state agencies “recommend” the use of soil background values in risk assessment. Although 8% of the responding states reported” no,” it is possible they may allow it while not actively recommending it. The survey did not address whether those states might “allow” use of soil background in risk assessment.

For further reference, the state guidance summary table (Table 13-1 Summary of the State Survey Summary) identifies specific guidance documents, some identified through the state survey and others researched independently, that address soil background use in risk assessments. 

Figure 12‑2. Recommend using natural and/or anthropogenic ambient soil background values in risk assessment.

Figure 12‑3 shows that more than half the survey responses indicated that the states have established statewide or regional soil background values. 

Figure 12‑3. Established statewide or regional background soil values.

More than half of the survey responses (Figure 12‑4) indicated that statewide or regional natural and/or anthropogenic ambient soil background studies have been conducted within the state. These studies may or may not have been prepared with agency approval or endorsement but rather by independent organizations or researchers. For example, some states will consider soil background surveys prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey, with or without state involvement, to be valid for use in risk assessments.

Figure 12‑4. Studies to establish statewide or regional soil background with or without agency approval/endorsement.

Figure 12‑5 shows that most of the states that responded to the survey (94%) allowed the use of geochemical evaluations to support risk assessments in some way.

Figure 12‑5. Allow geochemical evaluations to support risk assessment.

image_pdfPrint this page/section
glossary Full PDF
glossaryGlossary
referencesReferences
acronymsAcronyms
ITRC
Contact Us
About ITRC
social media iconsClick here to visit ITRC on FacebookClick here to visit ITRC on TwitterClick here to visit ITRC on LinkedInITRC on Social Media
about_itrc
Permission is granted to refer to or quote from this publication with the customary acknowledgment of the source (see suggested citation and disclaimer). This web site is owned by ITRC • 1250 H Street, NW • Suite 850 • Washington, DC 20005 • (202) 266-4933 • Email: [email protected] • Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Usage Policy ITRC is sponsored by the Environmental Council of the States.